New BARM is on Facebook/Twitter NOW!
Philippine Standard Time
Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Kung pagbabatayan ang pagmumukha ni Soriano
Sun Jan 08, 2017 2:42 am by Teng

» Survivor...
Wed Aug 31, 2016 1:00 pm by Esther

» Guys musta na kayo?
Fri May 10, 2013 8:51 am by RavlaM

» iNTRODUCTION
Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:52 pm by Comb@tron

» Lets talk about MARRIAGE
Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:49 pm by Comb@tron

» Para sa Muslim, Masama bang maging Pedopilyo?
Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:13 am by viruzol_007

» DEBATE with VANNIE...
Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:26 am by harballah

» DEATH PENALTY
Fri Mar 16, 2012 11:01 pm by RavlaM

» Ang katotohanan tungkol sa Iglesia ni Cristo na pekeng iglesia na tatag ni Manalo.
Wed Feb 29, 2012 7:57 pm by Lito

» Watch Impeachment trial Live Streaming: CJ CORONA
Thu Jan 19, 2012 4:02 pm by Disciple

» Si kapatid na Felix Manalo
Tue Nov 22, 2011 12:28 pm by Guest

» Ashampoo Burning Studio v10.0.15 Portable
Fri Nov 18, 2011 4:19 pm by Dhugz

» Atomix Virtual DJ Pro v7.0.5 Portable
Fri Nov 18, 2011 4:11 pm by Dhugz

» Constitutional Crisis?
Wed Nov 16, 2011 9:54 pm by Guest

» HOTSPOTSHIELD
Thu Nov 10, 2011 11:54 am by Disciple

November 2017
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Calendar Calendar

Social bookmarking

Social bookmarking Digg  Social bookmarking Delicious  Social bookmarking Reddit  Social bookmarking Stumbleupon  Social bookmarking Slashdot  Social bookmarking Yahoo  Social bookmarking Google  Social bookmarking Blinklist  Social bookmarking Blogmarks  Social bookmarking Technorati  

Bookmark and share the address of The New Public square on your social bookmarking website

Who is online?
In total there are 5 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 5 Guests

None

[ View the whole list ]


Most users ever online was 470 on Tue May 29, 2012 4:40 pm
Poll
FORUM TRANSLATOR
Forum Protection
Advertisement
HOTSPOTSHIELD

 

Protecting the web for your                                                                                                                                                                              security, privacy and anonymity!                                                                                                                                                                        Get behind the SHIELD! 100% FREE!

 


Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Page 6 of 7 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by Amp'd on Fri Sep 17, 2010 4:57 pm

BibleBot wrote:okey i peak it out mga readers

halatang di nagsusuri maigi si amp;d ng mga ireresearch di niya alam sa ginawa niya lalo lang siyang malulubog sa kahihiyan

ayun sa religioustolerance ganito daw

According to National Geographic: "Many archaeologists and theological scholars believe Jesus was actually born in either Nazareth or Bethlehem of Galilee, a town just outside Nazareth, citing biblical references and archaeological evidence to support their conclusion. Throughout the Bible, Jesus is referred to as 'Jesus of Nazareth,' not 'Jesus of Bethlehem.' In fact, in John (7:41- 43) there is a passage questioning Jesus' legitimacy because he's from Galilee and not Judaea, as the Hebrew Scriptures say the Messiah must be."

"Archaeological excavations have shown that Bethlehem in Judaea likely did not exist as a functioning town between 7 and 4 B.C., when Jesus is believed to have been born. Studies of the town have turned up a great deal of Iron Age material from 1200 to 550 B.C. as well as material from the sixth century A.D., but nothing from the first century B.C. or the first century A.D. Aviram Oshri, a senior archaeologist with the
Israeli Antiquities Authority, says, 'There is surprisingly no archaeological evidence that ties Bethlehem in Judea to the period in which Jesus would have been born'."

pansinin natin ayun daw sa religioustolerance ang nakaitalic form na iyan ay galing daw sa national geographic
pero pansinin natin ang reference link at iclick natin iyon
at dito daw kinuha iyon ng religoustolerance
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/
pansinin natin ang bibliography ni Larson yung claim awtor ng national geographic na pinaskil ng religoustolerance isa dun ay

“Where Was Jesus Born?” Religioustolerance.org.

araykupo nauntog na si amp'd nyan pansinin natin yung sinabi pala ni Larson kuha lang pala niya sa religioustolerance at hindi sa national geographic mismo
lol! lol! lol! wow sabaw! lol! lol! lol!

he he he, marunong ka bang umintindi ng mga links? ha? ibig mong sabihin ang religioustolerance.org nagfa-"fubricate" ng mga statements? Nakupo. Matinding paratang yan.

He he he, ang problema sa iyo hindi mo iniintindi ang basa mo eh.

BibleBot wrote:okey i peak it out mga readers

halatang di nagsusuri maigi si amp;d ng mga ireresearch di niya alam sa ginawa niya lalo lang siyang malulubog sa kahihiyan
hindi ko daw iniintindi ang mga pinapakita ko ha. malulubog daw ako sa kahihyan. Pero, di ko na kailangang kumilos pa kasi binabaril mo na ang sarili mo sa paa ("shooting yourself in the foot" - idiomatic expression).

Ang ginawa niya ang inintindi lang niya yung dulo, hindi naman inintindi yung buong text. PUTUL-PUTOL statement kasi. ha ha ha lol! lol! lol!

Examine natin ang ginawa ni junny:

BibleBot wrote:"Archaeological excavations have shown that Bethlehem in Judaea likely did not exist as a functioning town between 7 and 4 B.C., when Jesus is believed to have been born. Studies of the town have turned up a great deal of Iron Age material from 1200 to 550 B.C. as well as material from the sixth century A.D., but nothing from the first century B.C. or the first century A.D. Aviram Oshri, a senior archaeologist with the Israeli Antiquities Authority, says, 'There is surprisingly no archaeological evidence that ties Bethlehem in Judea to the period in which Jesus would have been born'."
Observe:
1. ang kanyang hinighlight ay ang last sentence lang.
2. hindi niya pinansin yung mga naunang bahagi ng paragraph na ito ang sinasabi:
"Archaeological excavations have shown that Bethlehem in Judaea likely did not exist as a functioning town between 7 and 4 B.C., when Jesus is believed to have been born. Studies of the town have turned up a great deal of Iron Age material from 1200 to 550 B.C. as well as material from the sixth century A.D., but nothing from the first century B.C. or the first century A.D."

3. ang problema ang pinaginitan niya ay ang sinabi ni Aviram Oshri. he he he. sinundan daw niya yung mga links at paikot ikot lang daw yung mga links at hindi daw galing sa national geographic ang mismong sinabi ni Oshri. he he he, kawawa naman. bumanat kasi kaagad (jumping the gun) at ayan hindi nakita yung iba pang material sa source site kaya hindi nasundan yung mga sinabi ni Oshri. Pakibasa nalang po ng buo yung source site at sayang ang bandwidth kung ika-copy paste ko pa ang buong page na iyon. free site na nga lang ito.

Ang nangyayari kay junny ay isang basic na phenomenon sa lahat ng tao na bumabasa sa Internet. May tendency tayo na basahin ang unahan at hulihan ng mga page at paragraphs kaya hindi natin napapansin yung buong paragraph o content ng buong page. Kailangan ng commitment to understanding and research para maintindihan at pagbabaran yung mga page na binabasa.

ang ginawa ni pastor bara bara lang at kaya na-miss nya ang iba pang content. he he he.

lol! lol! lol! wow sabaw! lol! lol! lol!
avatar
Amp'd
.
.

Posts : 224
Join date : 2010-08-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by Amp'd on Fri Sep 17, 2010 5:14 pm

lol! lol! lol! wow sabaw! lol! lol! lol!

BibleBot wrote:araykupo nauntog na si amp'd nyan pansinin natin yung sinabi pala ni Larson kuha lang pala niya sa religioustolerance at hindi sa national geographic mismo

Hindi mo talaga naiintindihan kung paano gumagana ang isang Bibliography ano?

Yan ang dedma syndrome. he he, ang pinansin lang niya ay ang unang reference na ginamit na makikita sa Bibliography. Eto po ang buong list na nasa Bibliography ng National Geographic:

Bibliography

“Where Was Jesus Born?” Religioustolerance.org.

Broadway, Bill. “The Story of Jesus’s Birth, Revised.” Washington Post, December 22, 2001.

How do Americans see Bethlehem? To see what Americans know of Bethlehem and how Bethlehem’s Christians and Muslims get along, check out these Zogby polls:

Map: “Bethlehem 2007 A.D.” National Geographic (December 2007), 70-71.

Benvenisti, Meron. Intimate Enemies: Jews and Arabs in a Shared Land. University of California Press, 1995.

Benvenisti, Meron. Sacred Landscape: The Buried History of the Holy Land Since 1948. University of California Press, 2002.

Cockburn, Andrew. “Lines in the Sand: Deadly Times in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.” National Geographic (October 2002).

Greenberg, Joel. “Bethlehem Sees a Christian Exodus.” Bethlehem Media Net, December 24, 2006..

Khalidi, Rashid. Iron Cage: The Story of the Palestinian Struggle for Statehood. Beacon Press, 2007.

Raheb, Mitri. Bethlehem Besieged: Stories of Hope in Times of Trouble. Augsburg Fortress Publishers, 2004.

Reinhart, Tanya. The Road Map to Nowhere: Israel/Palestine Since 2003. Verso, 2006.

Sennott, Charles. The Body and the Blood: The Middle East’s Vanishing Christians and the Possibility for Peace. Public Affairs, 2001.

Other Resources

The Applied Research Institute—Jerusalem
The Applied Research Institute—Jerusalem (ARIJ) promotes sustainable development in the occupied Palestinian territory and the self-reliance of the Palestinian people through greater control over their natural resources.

B’Tselem
The Israeli Information Center for Human Rights in the Occupied Territories was established in 1989 by a group of prominent academics, attorneys, journalists, and Knesset members to document human rights violations in the West Bank and Gaza Strip and to educate the Israeli public and policymakers.

Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics
The PCBS keeps statistics on demographic, social, economic, and environmental trends.

United Nations Office of the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs–Occupied Palestinian Territory
OCHA in the occupied Palestinian territory was established in late 2000 in response to the deteriorating humanitarian situation in the West Bank and Gaza.

United Nations: Question of Palestine
This site gives a history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and an overview of the issues, including a chronological list of events and maps and a list of relevant UN resolutions. source

Ang problema kasi porke may nakita lang siyang linkback eh jump to the conclusion na siya kaagad na fabricated ang statements. nakupo, hindi mo naman chineck yung ibang sources ang haba haba ng listahan.

gayahin natin ang style ni junny.

Eto ang natutunan ni junny:
1. basahin nang maigi ang buong paragraph.
2. huwag basta basta magparatang
3. intindihin ang ibig sabihin ng bibliography at kung paano ito gumagana
4. kung mamadaliin mo ang basa, mababaril mo lang ang sarili mo sa iyong paa (shoot yourself in the foot; idiom)
5. don't count your eggs before they're hatched
6. do not celebrate too early

heto lang ang masasabi ko sa mga post ni junny:

lol! lol! lol! wow sabaw! lol! lol! lol!

sa susunod ko na pupunahin yung iba niyang post. ha ha ha.

lol! lol! lol! wow sabaw! lol! lol! lol!

trabaho muna.

lol! lol! lol! wow sabaw! lol! lol! lol!
avatar
Amp'd
.
.

Posts : 224
Join date : 2010-08-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by Amp'd on Fri Sep 17, 2010 5:25 pm

Gayahin natin ang style ni junny:

"But while Luke and Matthew describe Bethlehem in Judea as the birthplace of Jesus, "Menorah," the vast database of the Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA), describes Bethlehem as an "ancient site" with Iron Age material and the fourth-century Church of the Nativity and associated Byzantine and medieval buildings. But there is a complete absence of information for antiquities from the Herodian period--that is, from the time around the birth of Jesus."source

hindi pala pumapabor ang archeological evidence na si Jesus ay pinanganak sa Bethlehem na alam ni junny. he he he.
avatar
Amp'd
.
.

Posts : 224
Join date : 2010-08-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by Amp'd on Fri Sep 17, 2010 5:32 pm

BibleBot wrote:naku simpleng english grammar di makaintindi
Mali ang unawa mo sa prepositions. he he he.

BibleBot wrote:parang ganito yan

Amp'd was Born at Manila

pwedeng ipinanganak si amp'd sa Sta. Cruz, Doroteo, V. Mapa, Anacleto at sa Manila Zoo

acceptable yun kasi yan po ay parte ng Manila
MALI.

1. Sta. Cruz is in Manila, NOT at Manila.
2. Doroteo is in Manila, NOT at Manila.
3. V. Mapa is in Manila, NOT at Manila.
4. Anacleto is in Manila, NOT at Manila.
5. Manila Zoo is in Manila, NOT at Manila.

Mali ang intindi mo kung paano ginagamit ang "at" at "in".

lol! lol! lol! Wow Sabaw!!! lol! lol! lol!

Yan kasi, alam naman namin na sablay ka sa Ingles nagmamarunong ka pa Junny eh.

lol! lol! lol! Wow Sabaw!!! lol! lol! lol!
avatar
Amp'd
.
.

Posts : 224
Join date : 2010-08-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by Amp'd on Fri Sep 17, 2010 5:38 pm

Ang Manila Zoo pala nasa tabi-tabi lang ng Maynila at hindi sa loob mismo ng Maynila. Ayos din si junny!

lol! lol! lol! Wow Sabaw!!! lol! lol! lol!
avatar
Amp'd
.
.

Posts : 224
Join date : 2010-08-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by Amp'd on Fri Sep 17, 2010 5:39 pm

BibleBot wrote:pansinin natin di niya sinasagot ang tanong ko na

yung Betlehem ba ay lugar sa loob ng Jerusalem?

hindi nya sasagutin yan

alam nyo mga reader kasi mabibisto

alam naman ng inyong lingkod na maraming lugar sa jerusalem. halimbawa sinabi sa bible na pinanganak si kristo sa Tel Arza tatanggapin ko na tama ang nasa book of mormon kasi ang Tel Arza ay isa sa mga lugar sa loob ng Jerusalem

kaso hindi po eh. para maging valid ang argument ng kanilang book of mormon patunayan muna nila na ang Betlehem ba ay parte ng Jerusalem

pero para sa karagdagang info eto po ang list ng mga lugar sa jerusalem sa link na nasa ibaba at kayo na ang magpapatotoo kung nasa Jerusalem ba ang Betlehem

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_places_in_Jerusalem

wow, lakas ng hangin ano?

pansin ko puro wikipedia pa rin ang pulot ni pastor junny. ha ha ha.

lol! lol! lol! Wow Sabaw!!! lol! lol! lol!
avatar
Amp'd
.
.

Posts : 224
Join date : 2010-08-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by Amp'd on Fri Sep 17, 2010 5:43 pm

BibleBot wrote:wow kopya ng kpya sa websayt ng di naiiintindihan ang pinagpapaskil
kopya daw ako ng kopya... kaya nga ang sabi kong nauna eh galing iyon sa mga site na nailink ko. ano ba yan. hindi nanaman makasunod sa daloy ng usapan.

hindi ko raw naiintindihan ang aking pinagpapaskil...

pero demonstrated na siya ang bara-bara kung bumanat at hindi umiintindi. ha ha ha.

lol! lol! lol! Wow Sabaw!!! lol! lol! lol!
avatar
Amp'd
.
.

Posts : 224
Join date : 2010-08-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by BibleBot on Sat Sep 18, 2010 2:28 pm

nandito sa link po na ito ang archeological evidence tungkol sa kapanganakan ni kristohttp://www.sacredsites.com/middle_east/israel/4_sacred_caves.htmlnanryan po ang totoong statement na me koloborasyon mula sa history at pagsusuri ng mga archeologistawtentik lahat ng pinakita run
avatar
BibleBot
.
.

Posts : 1426
Join date : 2010-07-20

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by BibleBot on Sat Sep 18, 2010 2:37 pm

mas krebidle ang pinaskil ko sa link na mababasa ninyo sa itaas. me ibubunyag pa ako mga readers di niyo po ba alam miski si Oshri ay nagkontrahan dinhttp://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/cp.01.htmlWEAVER: Bethlehem of Galilee, a village just over the hill from Nazareth, is an area that Israeli archaeologist, Aviram Oshri, has recently begun excavating.He is convinced that this is where Jesus was born, because of the evidence he dug up showing that this was a Christian holy site since the time of Jesus.kontra-kontrang statement ba? hindi po kasi yan po ay interview kay Oshri way back April 1, 2006 mas bago po kesa sa pinaskil na websayt ni Oshri way back Dec. 2005 pa yun. ibig sabihin po mha readers from Dec. 2005 - Apr. 2006 na pagaaral ni Oshri nakumbinsi na ito na totoo ngang dun pinanganak si kristo at base na rin sa kanyang patuloy na pagaaral. yung statement kasi ni Oshri nung Dec. 2005 yun ay bunga lamang ng partial na pagaaral nya pero sa 4 months na kanyang pagaaral ay nakumbinsi na siya na ang bethlehem ang lugar ng kapanganakan ni kristo
avatar
BibleBot
.
.

Posts : 1426
Join date : 2010-07-20

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by BibleBot on Sat Sep 18, 2010 2:37 pm

di na sinasagot ni amp'd itopansinin natin di niya sinasagot ang tanong ko nayung Betlehem ba ay lugar sa loob ng Jerusalem?hindi nya sasagutin yanalam nyo mga reader kasi mabibistoalam naman ng inyong lingkod na maraming lugar sa jerusalem. halimbawa sinabi sa bible na pinanganak si kristo sa Tel Arza tatanggapin ko na tama ang nasa book of mormon kasi ang Tel Arza ay isa sa mga lugar sa loob ng Jerusalemkaso hindi po eh. para maging valid ang argument ng kanilang book of mormon patunayan muna nila na ang Betlehem ba ay parte ng Jerusalempero para sa karagdagang info eto po ang list ng mga lugar sa jerusalem sa link na nasa ibaba at kayo na ang magpapatotoo kung nasa Jerusalem ba ang Betlehemhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_places_in_Jerusalem
avatar
BibleBot
.
.

Posts : 1426
Join date : 2010-07-20

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by Amp'd on Sun Sep 19, 2010 2:59 am

BibleBot wrote:nandito sa link po na ito ang archeological evidence tungkol sa kapanganakan ni kristohttp://www.sacredsites.com/middle_east/israel/4_sacred_caves.htmlnanryan po ang totoong statement na me koloborasyon mula sa history at pagsusuri ng mga archeologistawtentik lahat ng pinakita run

ha ha ha lol! lol! lol! lol!

heto nanaman po si pastor kuno junny. umiral nanaman. he he he

pansinin nyo po ano. ang sabi niya sa quote ko sa kanya, "totoong statement na me koloborasyon mula sa history at pagsusuri ng mga archeologist". Hindi nanaman nagbasa basa muna si pastor kuno junny. Masdan ang isang sampol quote mula sa pinaskil niyang site:

"Bethlehem is considered the site of the birth of Jesus Christ according to the Gospels of Mathew and Luke. Various New Testament scholars believe parts of these gospels to be later accretions and hold that Jesus was actually born in Nazareth, his childhood home. Christian belief however, has sanctified Bethlehem as Jesus' birthplace for nearly two millennia."

dito po yan mababasa:

http://www.sacredsites.com/middle_east/israel/4_sacred_caves.html

yung bethlehem pala ay "considered" lang na site ng kapanganakan ni Jesus. tapos ang giit pala ng mga scholar ay sa Nazareth talaga pinanganak si Jesus.

wow sabaw! lol! lol! lol!

banat kasi nang banat nang hindi nagbabasa eh.

eto pa po ang masdamaging sa credibility ni junny ngayon sa larangan ng pagbabasa, same source din po na nasa itaas. ibang paragraph lang po. eto po ang mababasa natin sa same page na yan:

" Whether or not Jesus was ever present at these places is a subject of intense scholarly debate. Certain narrow-minded theologians and fanatical Christians may insist on the fact of the matter on the basis of their 'faith'. Historians however, explain that there is no historical evidence to substantiate the matter (the Gospels of the New Testament are not considered historically accurate documents as they show many signs of multiple authorship, later additions and changes, and significant internal contradictions)."

same page lang po na pinagkunan ano. he he. mga "narrow-minded theologians at "fanatical Christians" lang pala ang nag gigiit na ang mga sacred sites na ito kagaya ng bethlehem na tinutukoy ni junny/biblebot ay ang actual na mga lugar na binabanggit sa biblia.

wow sabaw!!! lol! lol! lol!

in fact, doon mismo sa site na binibida ni junny eh sinupalpal siya. he he. ang sabi pala dun eh "there is no historical evidence to substantiate the matter". nakupo. eh di binaril nanaman ni junny ang sarili niya sa paa (shot himself in the foot, idiom).


magbasa basa muna kasi at huwag banat nang banat.
lol! lol! lol! lol! lol!
avatar
Amp'd
.
.

Posts : 224
Join date : 2010-08-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by Amp'd on Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:05 am

BibleBot wrote:mas krebidle ang pinaskil ko sa link na mababasa ninyo sa itaas. me ibubunyag pa ako mga readers di niyo po ba alam miski si Oshri ay nagkontrahan dinhttp://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/cp.01.htmlWEAVER: Bethlehem of Galilee, a village just over the hill from Nazareth, is an area that Israeli archaeologist, Aviram Oshri, has recently begun excavating.He is convinced that this is where Jesus was born, because of the evidence he dug up showing that this was a Christian holy site since the time of Jesus.kontra-kontrang statement ba? hindi po kasi yan po ay interview kay Oshri way back April 1, 2006 mas bago po kesa sa pinaskil na websayt ni Oshri way back Dec. 2005 pa yun. ibig sabihin po mha readers from Dec. 2005 - Apr. 2006 na pagaaral ni Oshri nakumbinsi na ito na totoo ngang dun pinanganak si kristo at base na rin sa kanyang patuloy na pagaaral. yung statement kasi ni Oshri nung Dec. 2005 yun ay bunga lamang ng partial na pagaaral nya pero sa 4 months na kanyang pagaaral ay nakumbinsi na siya na ang bethlehem ang lugar ng kapanganakan ni kristo

hahahaha!!! lol! lol! lol!

hindi nanaman binasa ni pastor junny ang buong page.
mga readers, sige po. buksan nyo po ang site na binanggit ni junny. basahin nyo nang buo. binabaril nanaman ni junny ang sarili niya sa paa.

pagbigyan naman natin siya na ayusin ang sarili niya. buksan nya sana ang page na siya mismo ang naglink at para matauhan siya sa kapalpaka niya. he he he.

ang hindi napansin ni pastor kuno junny eh hindi naman nagbago ang stance ni oshri (mali yata spelling ko ah). antok na ako eh. bilisan ko nalang magtype.

basahin nyo po ng buo ang mga statement at makikita ninyo na palpak nanaman ang intindi ng pastor kuno.

kung naguguluhan kayo sa link ni pastor este poser junny eto ulit yung link niya:

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/cp.01.html

hindi kasi inayos yung pagtype at nadikit yung url sa mismong salitang kino quote niya.

isa lang masasabi ko sa style na ganyan:

wow sabaw!!!! lol! lol! lol! lol! lol!
avatar
Amp'd
.
.

Posts : 224
Join date : 2010-08-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by Amp'd on Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:10 am

BibleBot wrote:di na sinasagot ni amp'd itopansinin natin di niya sinasagot ang tanong ko nayung Betlehem ba ay lugar sa loob ng Jerusalem?hindi nya sasagutin yanalam nyo mga reader kasi mabibistoalam naman ng inyong lingkod na maraming lugar sa jerusalem. halimbawa sinabi sa bible na pinanganak si kristo sa Tel Arza tatanggapin ko na tama ang nasa book of mormon kasi ang Tel Arza ay isa sa mga lugar sa loob ng Jerusalemkaso hindi po eh. para maging valid ang argument ng kanilang book of mormon patunayan muna nila na ang Betlehem ba ay parte ng Jerusalempero para sa karagdagang info eto po ang list ng mga lugar sa jerusalem sa link na nasa ibaba at kayo na ang magpapatotoo kung nasa Jerusalem ba ang Betlehemhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_places_in_Jerusalem

huh? di ko raw pinansin ang paskil na ito sa kabilang page. nakupo naman. tsk tsk tsk. pati ba naman paskil ng kausap niya kinatatamaran basahin. nakupo naman. tsk tsk tsk. read back ka nalang poser ju.. este pastor (kuno) junny.

mahiya hiya ka naman. post ka lang ng post eh. number 2 ka na nga sa site na ito sa dami ng post pero di mo pala carry na basahin ang mga reply sa post mo? tsk tsk tsk. tama si brad frank, sayang ang pearl. yuyurakan lang ng mga baboy. tsk tsk tsk.
avatar
Amp'd
.
.

Posts : 224
Join date : 2010-08-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by BibleBot on Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:15 am

pansinin natin yung stand ni Oshri eh nagbago pala iyon paglipas ng panahon. nung una (Dec. 2005) sinabi niya na wala daw archeological evidence pero nung April 2006 meron na. ibig sabihin sa span ng 4 na buwan eh nagbago ang tindig ni Oshri. at pansinin ninyo mga readers natulala si amp'd sa transcript of interview ng CNN at di niya maipakita kung saan binawi ni Oshri ang kanyang pagbabago ng statament,
avatar
BibleBot
.
.

Posts : 1426
Join date : 2010-07-20

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by BibleBot on Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:18 am

pansinin natin ang implikasyon ng sinabi ni Oshri: 1) kumbinsido siya na sa kanyang pagsusuri noong April 2006 (mas latest kesa sa pinaskil na websayt ni Amp'd noong Dec. 2005) na sa Bethlehem nga pinanganak si Kristo. 2) Ito ay dahil sa mga ebidensyang nakuha niya noong naghukay ito sa isang holy site, Ito ang di kayang i pabulaanan ni Amp'd Bethlehem of Galilee, a village just over the hill from Nazareth, is an area that Israeli archaeologist, Aviram Oshri, has recently begun excavating.He is convinced that this is where Jesus was born, because of the evidence he dug up showing that this was a Christian holy site since the time of Jesus
avatar
BibleBot
.
.

Posts : 1426
Join date : 2010-07-20

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by BibleBot on Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:22 am

pansinin natin sa ibaba ito ang pagkamangha na statement ni Oshri. AVIRAM OSHRI, ARCHAEOLOGIST, ISRAEL: After that, in the Byzantine time, we see a great Christian community here, that left here a very large church and monastery. And the whole settlement was fortified by a wall surrounding it. WEAVER: If this Bethlehem is the real birthplace of Jesus, not only would it upend centuries of tradition that have led pilgrims to Bethlehem of Judea, but it would also have explosive religious consequences. ayun kay Oshri kung tama daw ang kanyang findings na si kristo ay pinanganak sa Bethlehem ay isa itong malaking katotohanan mula sa religious tradition. hehehe so meaning sa itaas na websayt ko ay kumbinsido si Oshri na tama nga ang kanyang patotoo at sa sumunod na statement ito ay kanyang conclusion base sa kanyang latest na nadiscover. hehehe akala siguro ni amp'd nakaisa siya
avatar
BibleBot
.
.

Posts : 1426
Join date : 2010-07-20

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by BibleBot on Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:25 am

naku isa pang archeologist ang magpapatibay at maguugnay sa statement ni Oshri eto po. HAZELTON: It seems far more likely - and the only thing that makes sense to me - is that they registered for the census, not in Bethlehem of Judea, which is right beside Jerusalem, but in Bethlehem of the Galilee. It still exists. WEAVER: Bethlehem of Galilee, a village just over the hill from Nazareth, is an area that Israeli archaeologist, Aviram Oshri, has recently begun excavating. andyan po pinagtibay ng isa pang archeologist ang lugar ng kapanganakan ni kristo.
avatar
BibleBot
.
.

Posts : 1426
Join date : 2010-07-20

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by BibleBot on Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:28 am

tanungin natin ke amp'd kung sino ang historian na nagsasabing di totoo ang bethlehem ng kapanganakan ni kristo kasi ang alam naming historian na yun eh mga atheista o kontra sa bibliang kagaya ng LDS hehehehe, alamin natin at sasambulat din yan
avatar
BibleBot
.
.

Posts : 1426
Join date : 2010-07-20

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by Amp'd on Sun Sep 26, 2010 4:45 am

BibleBot wrote:pansinin natin yung stand ni Oshri eh nagbago pala iyon paglipas ng panahon. nung una (Dec. 2005) sinabi niya na wala daw archeological evidence pero nung April 2006 meron na. ibig sabihin sa span ng 4 na buwan eh nagbago ang tindig ni Oshri. at pansinin ninyo mga readers natulala si amp'd sa transcript of interview ng CNN at di niya maipakita kung saan binawi ni Oshri ang kanyang pagbabago ng statament,

ha ha ha nagbago daw!!!! ha ha ha!!!

lol! lol! lol!

basahin mo nang maigi. my goodness, kinokontra mo ang sarili mo eh. pinapalabas na hindi mo naiintindihan ang mga kino quote mo.

maghahanap nalang ako ng ibang kausap. ha ha ha!!!

lol! lol! lol!
avatar
Amp'd
.
.

Posts : 224
Join date : 2010-08-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by Amp'd on Sun Sep 26, 2010 4:46 am

BibleBot wrote:pansinin natin ang implikasyon ng sinabi ni Oshri: 1) kumbinsido siya na sa kanyang pagsusuri noong April 2006 (mas latest kesa sa pinaskil na websayt ni Amp'd noong Dec. 2005) na sa Bethlehem nga pinanganak si Kristo. 2) Ito ay dahil sa mga ebidensyang nakuha niya noong naghukay ito sa isang holy site, Ito ang di kayang i pabulaanan ni Amp'd Bethlehem of Galilee, a village just over the hill from Nazareth, is an area that Israeli archaeologist, Aviram Oshri, has recently begun excavating.He is convinced that this is where Jesus was born, because of the evidence he dug up showing that this was a Christian holy site since the time of Jesus

ha ha ha!!! hindi mo naiintindihan ang implications ng archeological findings sa Bethlehem of Galilee?

lol! lol! lol!
avatar
Amp'd
.
.

Posts : 224
Join date : 2010-08-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by Amp'd on Sun Sep 26, 2010 4:48 am

BibleBot wrote:pansinin natin sa ibaba ito ang pagkamangha na statement ni Oshri. AVIRAM OSHRI, ARCHAEOLOGIST, ISRAEL: After that, in the Byzantine time, we see a great Christian community here, that left here a very large church and monastery. And the whole settlement was fortified by a wall surrounding it. WEAVER: If this Bethlehem is the real birthplace of Jesus, not only would it upend centuries of tradition that have led pilgrims to Bethlehem of Judea, but it would also have explosive religious consequences. ayun kay Oshri kung tama daw ang kanyang findings na si kristo ay pinanganak sa Bethlehem ay isa itong malaking katotohanan mula sa religious tradition. hehehe so meaning sa itaas na websayt ko ay kumbinsido si Oshri na tama nga ang kanyang patotoo at sa sumunod na statement ito ay kanyang conclusion base sa kanyang latest na nadiscover. hehehe akala siguro ni amp'd nakaisa siya

ayos ah, paulit ulit nalang ang comedy show. lol! lol! lol!

halatang halata na hindi niya naiintindihan ang implikasyon ng word na "upend". ha ha ha.

kinokontra mo sarili antijehovahwitnessess/pastor junny/mylene aguilon/biblebot (dami mo nang alternick)

lol! lol! lol!
avatar
Amp'd
.
.

Posts : 224
Join date : 2010-08-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by Amp'd on Sun Sep 26, 2010 4:50 am

BibleBot wrote:naku isa pang archeologist ang magpapatibay at maguugnay sa statement ni Oshri eto po. HAZELTON: It seems far more likely - and the only thing that makes sense to me - is that they registered for the census, not in Bethlehem of Judea, which is right beside Jerusalem, but in Bethlehem of the Galilee. It still exists. WEAVER: Bethlehem of Galilee, a village just over the hill from Nazareth, is an area that Israeli archaeologist, Aviram Oshri, has recently begun excavating. andyan po pinagtibay ng isa pang archeologist ang lugar ng kapanganakan ni kristo.

ayos!!! binaril mo nanaman ang sarili mo sa paa!!! ayos!!!
lol! lol! lol!
avatar
Amp'd
.
.

Posts : 224
Join date : 2010-08-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by Amp'd on Sun Sep 26, 2010 4:52 am

BibleBot wrote:tanungin natin ke amp'd kung sino ang historian na nagsasabing di totoo ang bethlehem ng kapanganakan ni kristo kasi ang alam naming historian na yun eh mga atheista o kontra sa bibliang kagaya ng LDS hehehehe, alamin natin at sasambulat din yan

he he he, biglang liko nanaman si pastor junny sa ibang topic. he he he. nagquote lang ako sa site na nabanggit baling paksa nanaman. ha ha ha!!!

pero yung post ko tungkol sa sacredsites na page na binida niya inisnab ano? ha ha ha!!! lol! lol! lol!
avatar
Amp'd
.
.

Posts : 224
Join date : 2010-08-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by Amp'd on Sun Sep 26, 2010 4:53 am

bakit kaya inisnab ni junny yung post ko tungkol sa binida niya mula sa sacredsites.com?

ano kaya ang ikinatatakot ni junny na pastor kuno.
avatar
Amp'd
.
.

Posts : 224
Join date : 2010-08-10

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by BibleBot on Mon Sep 27, 2010 12:36 pm

upps walang binabaril kaibigan manapa ayun sa archeological findings ugma pa rin sa bible ito kasi specipikong sinasabin na sa Betlehem pinanganak si kristo
avatar
BibleBot
.
.

Posts : 1426
Join date : 2010-07-20

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Bakit may Book of Mormon si Smith?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 6 of 7 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum